News

24
PensionsEurope submits response to EIOPA discussion paper on sponsor support technical specifications
24/01/2014

29 October 2013 – In its submission (available here) to EIOPA’s discussion paper on sponsor support technical specifications, PensionsEurope reiterates its opposition to the Holistic Balance Sheet approach. However, given that EIOPA is continuing with this work on its own initiative, PensionsEurope is supplying comments on the technical details of the issues. PensionsEurope acknowledges that EIOPA intends to take proportionality into account through a simplified alternative approach to value sponsor support. However, the approach is deemed far too simplistic and only provide methodology to measure sponsor support with a relatively simple “1-1-1-1” combination (1 sponsor – 1 IORP - 1 pension promise - 1 country). The methodology to value sponsor support with combinations such as multi-employer plans, industry-wide plans, non-profit organisations, public sector IORPs, sponsors with multiple IORPs or IORPs for self-employed people is much more complex and remains understudied, unclear and burdensome. PensionsEurope warns that many IORPs –especially small and medium-sized IORPs - will not be able to make the calculation. Furthermore, PensionsEurope emphasizes the negative consequences that this approach would have on the sponsor companies in terms of investment, job creation and provision of occupational pension schemes.

21
PensionsEurope response to EIOPA consultation on a possible EU-single market for personal pension products
21/01/2014

14 August 2013 - In its submission to EIOPA's consultation, PensionsEurope highlighted the need to adequately define the scope of private personal pensions, clearly differentiating personal pensions from workplace pensions. EIOPA's powers to adopt effective policy actions in this field were also examined, underlying its lack of competence in fiscal matters. Moreover, PensionsEurope recognised that both "passporting" and the so-called "2nd regime" have important advantages but also significant drawbacks. Regardless of which approach is finally followed, it is PensionsEurope’s view that it should be respectful with the existing national personal pension schemes regimes so as to avoid disrupting systems that currently operate satisfactorily. Finally PensionsEurope asked EIOPA to closely coordinate with the different Directorate Generals of the European Commission dealing with personal and occupational pensions in order to ensure consistency across the different on-going initiatives in the EU. You can find the response here.

10
PensionsEurope welcomes Barnier's decision to postpone new solvency rules for IORPs
10/06/2013

23 May 2013 - European Commissioner for Internal Market and Services Michel BARNIER said today that solvency-rules should be an improvement for the pensions sector, rather than a punishment. Due to the large diversity in pension systems in Europe, it is impossible to develop good rules that fit all systems in the short term and more research is needed. Consequently, the European Commission will only propose rules for transparancy and governance for IORPs in the fall. Press release

26
PensionsEurope warns impact study insufficient for pensions overhaul
26/05/2013

14 May 2013 - PensionsEurope today issued its position paper on the preliminary results of the Quantitative Impact study (QIS). PensionsEurope reiterates its concerns about the Holistic Balance Sheet approach and states that the QIS cannot serve as a basis for an IORP II Directive Proposal. Moreover, PensionsEurope calls for a clear and reasonable new timetable for the whole revision process. Position Paper / Press release.

24
PensionsEurope welcomes Swedish Tjänstepensionsförbundet as new member
24/05/2013

22 April 2013 - Today, Tjänstepensionsförbundet, the Swedish Occupational Pension Fund Association, joined PensionsEurope. The decision was taken during the General Assembly Meeting in Vienna. You can find the press release here.

Pages